• Users Online: 215
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 111  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 15-19

Ocular infections after penetrating keratoplasty


Ophthalmology Department, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysore, India

Correspondence Address:
S.K. Prabhakar
Ophthalmology Department, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysore 570004, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejos.ejos_27_17

Rights and Permissions

Context Early diagnosis of ocular infections following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) depending on clinical presentation in addition to ancillary laboratory investigations facilitates preservation of useful vision and prevention of further intraocular spread. Aim The aim of this research was to study donor and recipient risk factors in post-PK ocular infections. Patients and methods This is an interventional prospective study. This prospective study was conducted in 34 patients who underwent PK under peribulbar anaesthesia from 2014 to 2016 in a tertiary hospital. Six patients developed signs and symptoms suspicious of postoperative infections. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are mentioned. MS excel was used for statistical analyses. Results The mean age was 53±18.04 years, ranging from 12 to 86 years with 24 (70.59%) male and 10 (29.41) female individuals studied. There were 24 (70.59%) right eyes and 10 left eyes (29.41). The mean age was 63.97±16.8 years among the donors. Six (17.64%) patients developed postoperative infections that included one patient with Pseudomonas aeroginosa keratoconjunctivitis, two patients with fusarium fungal keratitis and growth could not be established in the remaining three cases. Positive microbial identification by culture was possible in three (8.82%) patients. Conclusion Microbial identification was confirmed in three cases, and three cases were negative for growth. The risk factor found among recipients were vegetative injury, dust fall and eye rubbing, as well as taking a very hot bath. Graft clarity restoration significantly improved after topical management with fortified antibiotics and antifungal agents.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed72    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal