• Users Online: 555
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 109  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 32-40

Prevalence of dry eye disease in southern Egypt: a hospital-based outpatient clinic study


Ophthalmology Department, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt

Date of Submission15-Sep-2015
Date of Acceptance22-Dec-2015
Date of Web Publication21-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
Engy M Mostafa
Ophthalmology Department, Sohag University, Sohag 82524
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2090-0686.192749

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Purpose
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in a tertiary ophthalmic outpatient hospital-based clinic in southern Egypt.
Patients and methods
A cross-sectional, observational, hospital-based study of 3128 patients was conducted at the Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinic of the Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, between January 2011 and August 2013. The participants comprised adult ophthalmic outpatients aged 18 years or older. DED was assessed subjectively with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and objectively with Schirmer's test, tear film breakup time (TBUT), and conjunctival/corneal staining. An OSDI score of 22 or more with a TBUT of less than 10 s or Schirmer's test reading of less than 10 mm was considered diagnostic of definite DED. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. In all comparisons, P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Dry eye disease prevalence was 22.8% in the 3128 patients. DED was significantly more prevalent in patients 45 years or older and in females. An OSDI score more than 22 was found in 55%, TBUT less than 10 s in 44.7%, and Schirmer's test score less than 10 mm in 39.3%. DED symptoms are significantly associated with meibomian gland dysfunction, previous refractive surgery, and diabetes. Definite DED was significantly associated with previous cataract surgery, ocular allergy, pterygium, and diabetes.
Conclusion
This is the first observational study of DED in southern Egypt on a large sample population. The prevalence of DED among ophthalmic outpatients at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, was 22.8% depending on both symptoms and signs. Older age patients and females were more susceptible to DED. DED is an existing entity that can compound any eye condition causing incomplete recovery, and therefore high index of suspicion is greatly advised.

Keywords: dry eye disease, Egypt, Schirmer's test, tear film breakup time


How to cite this article:
Mostafa EM. Prevalence of dry eye disease in southern Egypt: a hospital-based outpatient clinic study. J Egypt Ophthalmol Soc 2016;109:32-40

How to cite this URL:
Mostafa EM. Prevalence of dry eye disease in southern Egypt: a hospital-based outpatient clinic study. J Egypt Ophthalmol Soc [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 5];109:32-40. Available from: http://www.jeos.eg.net/text.asp?2016/109/1/32/192749


  Introduction Top


The term ‘dry eye’ was first introduced by Andrew de Roetth in 1950 [1]. The definition evolved until 1995, and dry eye disease (DED) was defined as a complex multifaceted group of medical and ocular diseases caused by decreased tear production and/or increased tear evaporation [2]. In 2007, the International Dry Eye Workshop coined a new definition for dry eye as a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability with potential damage to the ocular surface. It is accompanied by increased osmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface [3].

Surveys over the last 20 years have estimated the prevalence of DED to be between 5% and more than 30% at various ages depending on which study is cited, how the disease is diagnosed, and which population is surveyed [3],[4],[5].

The burden of DED to the patient is not negligible. Studies suggest that DED can have a considerable impact on visual function, daily activities, social and physical functioning, workplace productivity, and direct and indirect costs of the disease [6],[7], with a substantial effect on sense of well-being that limits important daily activities and leads to a significantly reduced quality of life [8].

To the best of our knowledge, thus far, there are no studies conducted on the prevalence of dry eye in North Africa and Middle East depending on both signs and symptoms for diagnosis. In this study, an attempt was made to assess the magnitude of the problem of dry eyes in patients attending a general ophthalmology hospital eye clinic by administering a standard questionnaire and subjecting them to tests assessing the tear film profile.


  Patients and methods Top


This prospective, cross-sectional, observational, hospital-based study examined 3128 consecutive patients presenting for eye examination to a general ophthalmology university hospital clinic in Sohag city, 500 km south of Cairo, Egypt, between January 2010 and August 2013. The mean number of patients attending the clinic each week is 750.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients above 18 years of age presenting with various ophthalmic complaints such as irritation, discomfort, dryness, presence of foreign body sensation, gritty sensation, burning sensation, and light sensitivity. Exclusion criteria were as follows: ocular infections, patients diagnosed with and on treatment for DED, lid deformity or abnormal lid movement disorder, refractive surgery within 1 year of the study visit, current pregnancy or lactation, abnormal nasolacrimal drainage, and punctual plug placement within 30 days of testing.

Methods

All patients underwent a through history check by an ophthalmologist. The active complaints were recorded.

Subjective questionnaire

A wide variety of questionnaires is available for the evaluation of DED, such as Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEIVFQ-25), and McMonnies Dry Eye Questionnaire [9]. The OSDI questionnaire developed by the Outcomes Research Group at Allergan Inc. (Irvine, California, USA) is a useful tool for DED evaluation because of its simplicity and ease of use, which prompted us to use it after being translated into Arabic. It is a 12-item scoring survey, in which the patient rates his or her own ocular symptoms induced by environmental factors over the preceding 2–4 weeks. Answers are scored on a scale from 0 to 4; the total score can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability. The OSDI has an overall score and three subscale scores [ocular symptoms (three items), vision-related function (six items), and environmental triggers (three items)]. Each OSDI item is scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 points, where 0 indicates none of the time and 4 indicates all of the time. On the basis of their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0–12 points) or as having mild (13–22 points), moderate (23–32 points), or severe (33–100 points) ocular surface disease. In a study comparing the OSDI with other dry eye questionnaires, the former was reported to be reliable (ranging from good to excellent as an overall instrument) and to have high validity [10]. The OSDI questionnaire was administered by trained nurses (under supervision of the ophthalmologist) to help patients with no reading skills.

A complete ocular examination was carried out.

External ocular examination

The lids were examined for the presence of any anatomical abnormalities interfering with normal spread of the tear film.

Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed, and the presence of mucus strands in the tear film and corneal filaments was noted. Lid margins were examined for irregularity or thickening. The integrity of meibomian gland function was assessed for all patients according to the Foulks–Bron scoring system [11]. Meibomian orifices were examined for pouting, presence of foam, secretion, and plugging. The tarsal conjunctiva was examined for the presence of papillae.

Objective testing included the following:

  1. Ocular surface staining by fluorescein dye was carried out. The Oxford schema (Bron) [12] was used to estimate the surface damage (staining of the cornea and conjunctiva).
  2. Tear film breakup time (TBUT) test was performed: 1% fluorescein dye was applied to the eye, and the average of three consecutive breakup times (using a stopwatch) was calculated. A breakup time of less than 10 s was considered abnormal.
  3. Finally, Schirmer's test with a local anesthetic (benoxinate hydrochloride 0.4%) was performed. After 2 min, Whatman's filter paper (5 mm × 35 mm, no. 41) was applied to the inferior conjunctival sac at the junction of the lateral one-third and medial two/thirds. The patient was instructed to look straight and was allowed to blink. After 5 min, the test strips were removed, and the amount of wetting was noted. Values less than 10 mm were considered to be abnormal.


The sequence of these tests was maintained so that each test did not affect the following. An OSDI score of 22 and above with a TBUT 10 s or less or Schirmer's test measurement 10 mm or less was considered diagnostic of definite DED. The classification of dry eye was carried out using the International Dry Eye Workshop severity grading system, which adopted and modified the Delphi scheme [13].

Written consent was obtained from all patients recruited to this study. The research protocol was approved by an institutional review board of Sohag University, Faculty of Medicine, and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

The worse eye of each patient was used for the analysis. Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism Software (version 6) (La Jolla, CA, USA). Analyses were performed according to age and sex. Tests for significant between-class differences utilized the χ2-test for categorical variables and the Student's t-test for continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficients of determination were calculated (r2) between each measurement type. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Demographics

In total, 3128 patients were recruited. The percentage of female patients was 58.3%. The mean patient age was 42±21 years. The age range was 18–75 years. Age and sex distribution of the participants are demonstrated in [Table 1].
Table 1: Age and sex distribution of 3128 patients

Click here to view


[Table 2] demonstrates patients’ characteristic associations. The prevalence of ocular allergic symptoms and signs was 13.7%, which was significantly more prevalent in females (P = 0.015). The number of computer users was 739 (23.6%), with patients belonging mostly to the less than 45 years of age group. Male smokers constituted 25.9% of the population, whereas most of the females (14.7%) were passive smokers. Only eight patients had the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Table 2: Patient characteristics

Click here to view


The overall prevalence of dry eye was 22.8%. DED was significantly more prevalent in patients 45 years or older (with a prevalence of 71.7%) compared with those younger than 45 years of age (P = 0.001; [Table 3]). There were significant differences in overall dry eye prevalence between the sexes (P = 0.015). The percentage distribution according to the severity of DED is demonstrated in [Figure 1].
Table 3: Distribution of definite dry eye disease by age group and sex

Click here to view
Figure 1: Distribution of patients with dry eye disease according to the severity based on Classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007).

Click here to view


The prevalence of DED symptoms and signs varied as follows: significant symptoms (OSDI>22) in 49.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 23.1–43.4], TBUT less than 10 s in 44.7% (95% CI: 42–59.1), Schirmer's score less than 10 mm in 39.3% (95% CI: 45.0–52.2), corneal fluorescein staining score greater than 1 in 30.6% (95% CI: 41.6–98.6), and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) was found in 18.5% (95% CI: 33.2–54) ([Figure 2]).
Figure 2: Percentage of patients with MGD, corneal staining, Schirmer's test score less than 10 mm, TBUT less than 10 s, OSDI more than 22, and definite dry eye disease. MGD, meibomian gland dysfunction; OSDI, Ocular Surface Disease Index; TBUT, tear film breakup time.

Click here to view


Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire

The scores of items of the OSDI questionnaire are detailed in [Figure 3]. The percentage of patients who scored more than 22 was 49.6% with females constituting 55%. The mean±SD OSDI score was 31 ± 21 (range: 4–75). Among symptoms experienced, the most frequent symptoms with a score of 1 or more were eye discomfort in windy conditions (85%), sore painful eyes (60%), and gritty sensation (60%), whereas blurred vision was reported in 44% of patients. There was a statistically significant difference in OSDI scores between sexes (43 for females vs. 29 for males; P = 0.05). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference in OSDI scores between the younger age groups (18–45 years) and the older age groups (45–75 years) (P = 0.006). Of the 3128 patients, 24% reported the presence of one or more symptoms of dry eye often or always, whereas 21.5% reported the presence of symptoms sometimes, and 55.5% of them rarely had any symptoms. In contrast, MGD was significantly associated with OSDI scores more than 22 (P = 0.04), where 22.6% of symptomatic patients had MGD. This also applies to patients with previous refractive surgery and diabetic patients (P = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). Dry eye symptoms were not significantly associated with other systemic diseases or medications.
Figure 3: The distribution of scores of items of Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire.

Click here to view


Clinical tests

Data are presented for the worse eye only as the agreement between the left eye and the right eye was very high for all clinical signs.

Schirmer's test

The mean±SD Schirmer's test score was 8.6 ± 8.7 mm (range: 3–16 mm). Comparison between age groups showed that patients aged 45 and above were found to have lower mean Schirmer's test scores (P = 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between sexes. The same applies to premenopausal and postmenopausal women. There was an inverse correlation between daily hours of computer use and Schirmer's test scores (r2 = −0.20, P = 0.04).

Tear film breakup time

TBUT less than 10 s was prevalent in 44.7% of cases, whereas only 50.9% of them had TBUT less than 5 s.

Prevalence of definite dry eye disease

Definite DED was found in 22.8% of outpatients who attended the eye clinic and met the inclusion criteria. Cataract extraction was associated with the highest percentage (57.1%) of definite DED among ocular pathologies followed by patients with ocular allergy (44.9%) and by those who had pterygia (40.9%). Among the systemic diseases, diabetes had the strongest association with definite DED (61.2%).

Correlation between subjective questionnaire and clinical tests

The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.45 for Schirmer's test, 0.72 for breakup time, and 0.54 for corneal staining. Thus, a lower TBUT score has a better association with the presence of frequent dry eye symptoms compared with the other tests ([Table 4]).
Table 4: Association between Ocular Surface Disease Index scores and positive dry eye tests

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Dry eye is a far too common disorder seen in ophthalmic practice, presenting with myriad of symptoms and signs that the clinician too often overlooks, resulting in underdiagnosis of the condition [14]. In this study, an attempt was made to find out the magnitude of the problem in patients visiting Sohag University Hospital Outpatient Clinic, their sex, age distribution, and their common symptomatology.

Population-based epidemiologic data including symptoms and signs of dry eye in different age groups have been reported in different studies in different areas of the world as shown in [Table 5],[Table 6],[Table 7]. Nevertheless, the prevalence has varied with regard to their diagnostic criteria. Some studies have used only symptoms in their determination of dry eye prevalence [22],[38],[39], whereas other studies have used symptoms in addition to biomicroscopic examination [40] and/or tests of ocular surface staining, tear film stability, and tear secretion [5],[14]. For the detection of dry eye conditions, neither history nor biomicroscopy alone was found to be adequate [40].
Table 5: Prevalence studies of dry eye disease in Australia, Europe, and North America

Click here to view
Table 6: Prevalence studies of dry eye disease in Asia

Click here to view
Table 7: Prevalence studies of dry eye disease in Africa

Click here to view


The prevalence was lower when a combination of signs and symptoms were used as diagnostic criteria as in the Salisbury Eye Study [14], which matched this study's results. The prevalence was higher when symptomatic patients were examined for DED. Nita et al.[25] found that out of the 237 patients who presented with standard symptoms of dry eye, 63% of patients were diagnosed positive for the disease. This also applies to the Shihpai Eye Study, which studied the Chinese population in Taiwan, and reported dry eye incidence of 62.5% in symptomatic patients [4]. Out of the patients with OSDI score more than 22, 45.9% had DED.

In contrast to this study, the prevalence of abnormal dry eye tests in studies of white populations was lower. Possible explanations for these prevalence differences include race and ethnicity, participation rates, climate, environment, and pre-existing ocular conditions such as trachoma, which used to be endemic in this part of the world. As this study was conducted in southern Egypt, increased sunlight exposure and high ambient temperature may increase the frequency of dry eye symptoms [41]. Kjaergaard et al. [42] reported that low ambient temperature and high relative humidity (RH) are associated with more tear film stability than low RH and high temperature, which applies to the geographic area where the study was conducted. Exposure to sun, dust, and wind exacerbate or precipitate DED [41].

A few reports could be found from Africa. Onwubiko et al.[37] conducted a similar study in Nigeria on 402 adult patients with a DED criteria of OSDI score of 50 and above with a TBUT less than 5 s or Schirmer's test measurement less than 10 mm. They reported a DED prevalence of 19.2%. Given the fact that the sample size is far much larger and the DED diagnosis criteria are less restrictive, the prevalence is therefore slightly higher (22.8%).

A study on 200 outpatients in Egypt (Beni-Suef University Hospital) [35] showed prevalence of dry eye symptoms in 11.5% of patients and 2.5% with symptoms and an abnormal clinical test.

The published data regarding the relation between dry eye and age consistently show that dry eye is more common in the elderly [4],[5],[22]. In this study, an association with age was found in the analysis of dry eye tests as well as in the analysis of dry eye symptoms, which was not the case with Schaumberg et al.[21].

The female patients showed higher prevalence of DED, which is similar to the results of other studies [5],[15],[26],[43] but different from the results of Schein et al.[14] who reported no sex difference in prevalence. Hormonal studies suggest that sex hormones influence ocular surface conditions through their effects on tear secretions, meibomian gland function, and conjunctival goblet cell density [44]. Androgen levels are higher in men than in women throughout life, and both sexes experience a decline in bioavailable androgens with aging [45], which explains both the higher prevalence in females as well as the elderly.

The poor correlation between symptoms and signs has been frequently reported in the literature [46],[47]. In this study, the strong association between positive TBUT and significant dry eye symptoms was found. The paradoxical relationship between symptoms and signs in DED can be explained either by the fact that symptoms can precede signs or that DED is a heterogeneous condition differing in etiology and pathophysiology, which varies from corneal nerve damage [48] to inflammatory processes [49], and different objective tests measure different aspects of tear physiology. There is also the fact that symptoms of DED are not specific to this particular disorder.

Dry eye disease is also associated with certain ocular conditions. The present study shared the results of the Beaver Dam Eye Study cohorts [22], which found that cataract extraction surgery was related to increased prevalence of dry eye. A reasonable explanation would be postoperative corneal desensitization. In the present study, lens surgery was an association in 34% of cases.

The association of dry eye and diabetes is still a debatable issue, where Moss et al.[50] reported that the long-term incidence of DED was not significantly associated with diabetes, whereas other studies have reported the opposite [51],[52],[53]. In the present study, 57.1% of definite dry eye patients had diabetes mellitus. The mechanism for increased occurrence of dry eye in diabetes mellitus is unclear. It is possible that damage to the microvasculature of the lacrimal gland together with autonomic neuropathy may contribute to impaired function of the gland. Sensory neuropathy of the cornea may also play a role. Moreover, the various medications used by diabetic patients may exacerbate the dry eye state [54]. Other postulations include the involvement of aldose reductase, the first enzyme of the sorbitol pathway. The oral administration of aldose reductase inhibitors has been shown to improve tear dynamics significantly [55].

DED was higher (49%) in the patients with previous LASIK surgery (n = 285), as refractive surgery affect corneal nerves either by severing or by ablation, resulting in high incidence of postoperative DED [56].

This study reveals the higher prevalence of DED among smokers (either active or passive), reaching 52.8%. A study conducted by El-Shazly et al.[36] in Egypt to detect the effect of passive smoking on tear film status in children found that 74.2% had dry eye symptoms and signs. This is consistent with the results of Lee et al.[28] in Indonesia, which revealed a 1.5-fold increase in DED in smokers. However, McCarty et al.[5] found no association despite running multivariate logistic regression models in the Melbourne study. There have been discrepancies in associating MGD with specific clinical features of dry eye. Results from a Chinese and Taiwanese study showed no correlation of MGD with dry eye symptoms [43] or Schirmer's test [4], whereas in the Salisbury Eye Study MGD was associated with dry eye symptoms [14]. Moreover, several population-based studies reporting dry eye [5],[21],[22],[57] have not reported its relationship with MGD.


  Conclusion Top


The prevalence of DED among adult ophthalmic outpatients at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, was 22.8%. Older age and female sex were the significant sociodemographic predictors of DED. The unique environmental characteristics may also have a role in the magnitude of the problem of DED. The importance of trying to outline the demographics of DED in our community lies in its irritative symptoms, which can be debilitating and result in both psychological and physical effects compromising the quality of life. In addition, DED should be taken more seriously both by the physician and by the patient to guarantee both high index of suspicion for the physician and compliance on the patient part. Future population-based surveys on DED types are warranted to unravel the subtypes of DED in our environment and to determine whether there are risk factors that can be avoided. [58]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Murube J. Andrew de Roetth (1893-1981): dacryologist who introduced the term dry eye. Ocul Surf 2004; 2:225–227.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J 1995; 21:221–232.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007; 5:75–92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2003; 110:1096–1101.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology 1998; 105:1114–1119.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Miljanović B, Dana R, Sullivan DA, Schaumberg DA. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:409–415.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pflugfelder SC. Prevalence, burden, and pharmacoeconomics of dry eye disease. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14 (Suppl):S102–S106.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lemp MA. Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146:350–356.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
McMonnies CW, Ho A. Responses to a dry eye questionnaire from a normal population. J Am Optom Assoc 1987; 58:588–591.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118:615–621.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf 2003; 1:107–126.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003; 22:640–650.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Stern L, Chuck RS, McDonnell PJ, Azar DT et al. Dysfunctional tear syndrome study group Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea 2006; 25:900–907.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schein OD, Muñoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 124:723–728.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Maroun R, Wang JJ. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31:229–232.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bjerrum KB. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca and primary Sjögren's syndrome in a Danish population aged 30-60 years. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997; 75:281–286.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Clegg JP, Guest JF, Lehman A, Smith AF. The annual cost of dry eye syndrome in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom among patients managed by ophthalmologists. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006; 13:263–274.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Malet F, Le Goff M, Colin J, Schweitzer C, Delyfer MN, Korobelnik JF et al. Dry eye disease in French elderly subjects: the Alienor Study. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92:e429–e436.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Richter D, Simpson T, Caffery B, Gordon K. A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74:624–631.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yazdani C, McLaughlin T, Smeeding JE, Walt J. Prevalence of treated dry eye disease in a managed care population. Clin Ther 2001; 23:1672–1682.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136:318–326.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118:1264–1268.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Miljanovic BM,Dana R, Sullivan D, Schaumberg DA. Prevalence and risk factors for dry eye syndrome among older men in the United States. Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO); 6-10 May 2007; Fort Lauderdale, FL; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lam DKT, Wong VWY, Chow VWS, Chi SCC. Epidemiology of dry eye syndrome in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional population-based study. Hong Kong J Ophthalmol 2011; 15:58–62.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Nita S, Verghese A, Joseph V. Dry eye – a hospital based incidence study. Kerala J Ophthalmol 2009; 21:396–401.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Gupta N, Prasad I, Jain R, D'Souza P. Estimating the prevalence of dry eye among Indian patients attending a tertiary ophthalmology clinic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2010; 104:247–255.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rege A, Kulkarni V, Puthran N, Khandgave T. A clinical study of subtype-based prevalence of dry eye. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7:2207–2210.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Widjaja D, Tan DT. Prevalence and risk factors associated with dry eye symptoms: a population based study in Indonesia. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:1347–1351.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Results of a population-based questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye. Cornea 1999; 18:408–411.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, Uchino Y, Fukagawa K, Shimmura S et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1982–1988.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Uchino M, Uchino Y, Dogru M, Kawashima M, Yokoi N, Komuro A et al. Dry eye disease and work productivity loss in visual display users: the Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 157:294–300.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Mohd-Ali B SFL, Abdul-Mutalib H, Mohidin N. Incidence of dry eye in a sample population in Kuala Lumpur. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health 2011; 3:839–845.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Keshav BR, Mathews B, Joseph M, Zachariah G, Ideculla T. Tear film status in patients attending the eye clinic in South sharqiya region. Oman Med J 2007; 22:42–46.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand. Cornea 2006; 25:1162–1167.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Tawfeek AM, Kamel SA, Saif El-Din MYS, Abd EL- Khalek MO. Prevalenceof dry eye syndrome in Beni-Suief Population. Ophthalmology Department Egypt: Beni-Suief 2011; v. Master.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
El-Shazly AA, El-Zawahry WM, Hamdy AM, Ahmed MB. Passive smoking as a risk factor of dry eye in children. J Ophthalmol 2012; 2012:130159.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Onwubiko SN, Eze BI, Udeh NN, Arinze OC, Onwasigwe EN, Umeh RE. Dry eye disease: prevalence, distribution and determinants in a hospital-based population. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37:157–161.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Bandeen-Roche K, Muñoz B, Tielsch JM, West SK, Schein OD. Self-reported assessment of dry eye in a population-based setting. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:2469–2475.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols K, Mitchell GL, Chalmers R. DREI study group. Results of a dry eye questionnaire from optometric practices in North America. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506 (Pt B):1009–1016.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
McMonnies CW, Ho A. FJ H. Marginal dry eye diagnosis: history versus biomicroscopy. The preocular tear film in health, disease and contact lens wear.. Lubbock, TX:Dry Eye Institute; 1986. 32–38.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Khurana AK, Choudhary R, Ahluwalia BK, Gupta S. Hospital epidemiology of dry eye. Indian J Ophthalmol 1991; 39:55–58.  Back to cited text no. 41
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
42.
Kjaergaard SK, Hempel-Jørgensen A, Mølhave L, Andersson K, Juto JE, Stridh G. Eye trigeminal sensitivity, tear film stability and conjunctival epithelium damage in 182 non-allergic, non-smoking Danes. Indoor Air 2004; 14:200–207.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Jie Y, Xu L, Wu YY, Jonas JB. Prevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing Eye Study. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23:688–693.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2009; 3:405–412.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Labrie F, Bélanger A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Candas B. Marked decline in serum concentrations of adrenal C19 sex steroid precursors and conjugated androgen metabolites during aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82:2396–2402.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Zadnik K. Frequency of dry eye diagnostic test procedures used in various modes of ophthalmic practice. Cornea 2000; 19:477–482.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Schein OD, Tielsch JM, Munõz B, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Relation between signs and symptoms of dry eye in the elderly. A population-based perspective. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1395–1401.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Belmonte C, Aracil A, Acosta MC, Luna C, Gallar J. Nerves and sensations from the eye surface. Ocul Surf 2004; 2:248–253.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Fujishima H, Toda I, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80:994–997.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Long-term incidence of dry eye in an older population. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85:668–674.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Yu L, Chen X, Qin G, Xie H, Lv P. Tear film function in type 2 diabetic patients with retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222:284–291.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Rahman A, Yahya K, Ahmed T, Sharif-Ul-Hasan K. Diagnostic value of tear films tests in type 2 diabetes. J Pak Med Assoc 2007; 57:577–581.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Wang TJ, Wang IJ, Hu CC, Lin HC. Comorbidities of dry eye disease: a nationwide population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90:663–668.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Kaiserman I, Kaiserman N, Nakar S, Vinker S. Dry eye in diabetic patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139:498–503.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Ramos-Remus C, Suarez-Almazor M, Russell AS. Low tear production in patients with diabetes mellitus is not due to Sjogren's syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1994; 12:375–380.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Komai-Hori Y, Tsubota K. Dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132:1–7.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Caffery BE, Richter D, Simpson T, Fonn D, Doughty M, Gordon K. CANDEES. The Canadian Dry Eye Epidemiology Study. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 438:805–806.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Gillan WDH. A small-sample survey of dry eye symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index. S Afr Optom 2009; 68 4:188–191.  Back to cited text no. 58
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]


This article has been cited by
1 Noncontact Meibography in Patients with Keratoconus
Engy Mohamed Mostafa,Marwa Mahmoud Abdellah,Ashraf Mostafa Elhawary,Amr Mounir
Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019; 2019: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2951    
    Printed66    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded311    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]